MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415826786 · doi:10.2196/72244

Association of Modifiable Lifestyle and Metabolic Factors With the Risk of Developing Sepsis: 2-Sample Mendelian Randomized Study

2025· article· en· W4415826786 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haifeng Lv, Jing Liu, Yelin Cao, Weina Fan, Guojie Shen, Xiaoliang Wu, Kaijin Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Journal of Medical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationAssociation (psychology)Randomized controlled trialMetabolic syndromeWaistGenetic associationObesityRisk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by organ dysfunction resulting from dysregulated host response to infections. Approximately 48.9 million people worldwide are diagnosed with sepsis annually, leading to 11 million deaths and representing 19.7% of all global deaths. No specific, effective treatments for sepsis, which has a poor prognosis, are available. Objective: The study aimed to systematically explore the association between genetically predicted modifiable risk factors and sepsis. Methods: Univariable 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to explore the association between 30 modifiable risk factors (12 lifestyle, 3 educational and psychological, and 15 metabolic factors) and sepsis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochran Q analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using the MR-Egger regression intercept tests and leave-one-out analyses. Additionally, multivariable MR analyses were performed to adjust for genetic associations between the instruments and obesity. Results: Genetically predicted smoking (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36; P=.005), a higher number of cigarettes smoked daily (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.23; P<.001), a higher overall health rating (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.61-2.98; P<.001), BMI (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.63; P<.001), waist circumference (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.53-1.89; P<.001), whole body fat mass (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.37-1.64; P<.001), trunk fat mass (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36-1.62; P<.001), arm fat mass (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.43-1.71; P<.001), and leg fat mass (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.90; P<.001) were associated with increased sepsis risk. However, light physical activity (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.83; P=.03), higher education attainment (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.67; P<.001), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98; P=.02) exhibited protective effects against sepsis. Using a multivariate analysis of obesity traits, the waist circumference (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.18-3.96; P=.01) was an independent risk factor of sepsis. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that genetic predictors of lifestyle (smoking and physical activity), educational level, and metabolic factors (waist circumference and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) exhibited a causal association with sepsis risk. Future research should further investigate the underlying mechanisms of these associations to inform more effective preventive strategies against sepsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInteractive Journal of Medical ResearchSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207