Differential Control of HIV-1 Replication by IFN-α14 Compared to IFN-α2 Relates to Differences in the Modulation of Host Antiretroviral Restriction Factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Type I IFN, including IFN-α, induces the expression of antiviral restriction factors that can interfere with multiple steps of the HIV-1 replication cycle. Humans have 13 IFN-α genes which encode 12 different IFN-α subtypes. Our previous work in HIV-1 infected humanized mice showed that IFN-α14 treatment more potently controlled HIV-1 than treatment with the clinically approved IFN-α2 subtype. However, the mechanisms behind the more potent control of HIV-1 by IFN-α14 are unknown. The IFN-α14 subtype is known to more potently induce the expression of the restriction factors MX2 and ISG15 and increased APOBEC3G signature mutations in vivo compared to IFN-α2. To study the importance of each of these restriction factors in mediating the potent control of HIV-1, we used a CRISPR-Cas9 lentivirus system to create stable knockouts in the MT4C5 cell line that is susceptible to HIV-1 but does not produce measurable amounts of endogenous IFN-α. Knock out of ISG15, but not MX2, eliminated differences in viral suppression after IFN-α14 and IFN-α2 treatment. Similarly, APOBEC3G deletion eliminated differences in viral suppression and the number of infectious particles produced after IFN-α14 and IFN-α2 treatment. Furthermore, APOBEC3G deletion resulted in significantly fewer GG→AG mutations in viral DNA isolated from target cells incubated with supernatant from IFN-α14 treated groups. However, APOBEC3G knock out did not result in significant increases in vDNA compared to the wild type in any experimental group. Overall, elimination of APOBEC3G and ISG15 impaired IFN-α14–mediated suppression of HIV-1, highlighting them as downstream effectors of IFN-α14’s more potent anti-HIV-1 activity. IMPORTANCE This study uncovers the molecular basis for the more potent antiviral activity of IFN-α14 compared to the clinically used IFN-α2 subtype against HIV-1. Although interferons are known to induce numerous restriction factors, the mechanisms underlying subtype-specific antiviral potency remained unclear. By using CRISPR-Cas9 knockout MT4C5 cell lines, the study identifies ISG15 and APOBEC3G as key effectors mediating IFN-α14’s enhanced suppression of HIV-1 replication. Loss of either ISG15 or APOBEC3G abolished the differential antiviral effect between IFN-α14 and IFN-α2, demonstrating their essential roles in IFN-α14 driven viral restriction. These findings highlight that individual IFN-α subtypes engage distinct downstream pathways and that subtype diversity encodes functional specialization rather than redundancy. Overall, this work advances our understanding of innate immune control of HIV-1 and provides a foundation for developing targeted interferon-based therapies that exploit the unique mechanisms of potent subtypes like IFN- α14.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".