MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415829174 · doi:10.1016/j.rines.2025.100139

Integrating field data, petrography, and induced polarization geophysical survey for 3D modeling and delineation of gold mineralization targets in Bissiang area, Nyong group, Cameroon

2025· article· en· W4415829174 on OpenAlexaff
Kouankap Nono Gus Djibril, Mohamed Moustapha Ndam Njikam, A. Ribodetti, Njikeu Olivier, Robillard Claude

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Earth Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsGeophysics GPR International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced polarizationAlluviumPlacer miningSinistral and dextralCratonDrillingMagnetic surveyMineralization (soil science)Sediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stream sediments sampling, lithological observations and induced polarization (IP) survey were carried out in Bissiang area, located at the northwestern border of the Congo Craton in Cameroon. The aim of the study was to delineate potential gold targets through the integration of field, petrographic, and geophysical data. Most stream sediment samples yielded alluvial gold particles, suggesting a mineralized catchment composed of quartzite, schist, and gneiss. Inverted chargeability sections helped identify Very High Chargeability (VHC) and High Chargeability (HC) domains, interpreted as potential primary and secondary gold targets, respectively. Their spatial correlation revealed a N-S-trending anomaly affected by a dextral fault, and a 3D model of the VHC (25–44 mV/V) and HC (15–25 mV/V) domains was developed. The volume of the primary VHC targets was estimated at 340,388,500 m 3 and that of the secondary or HC targets at 705,358,000 m 3 . These results provide a basis for further exploration and drilling campaigns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in Earth SciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207