MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415833951 · doi:10.13057/smj.v8i2.106552

A Decade of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis using VOSviewer

2025· article· W4415833951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luluk Fajria Maulida, Revi Gama Hatta Novika, Nurul Jannatul Wahidah, Rufidah Maulina, Siti Nurhidayati, Atriany Nilam Sari, Fadhila Tsania Richa

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingScopusInclusion (mineral)BibliometricsPeer reviewWeb of scienceMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction : A mother’s confidence in her ability to breasfeed, known as breastfeeding self efficacy (BSE) is a key predictor of exclusive breastfeeding duration. This study aimed to analyze the development of BSE research and provide insights for researchers and policymakers to improve future studies. Method : This bibliometric analysis was conducted using data from the Scopus database, one of the largest sources of peer reviewed literature. Articles were retrieved on August 7, 2024, using the keywords “Breastfeeding” AND “Self” AND “Efficacy.” A total of 1,006 documents were identified. After applying inclusion criteria (English language, article or review type, published between 2014 and 2023, open access, and final publication stage), 413 documents were selected for analysis. Data were analyzed using VOSviewer version 1.6.20 based on publication year, journal source, author, country of origin, and keywords. Results : Research on BSE has shown a consistent upward trend over the past decade, with the highest number of publications in 2023 (82 articles). The United States was the most productive country, followed by Brazil, Canada, the United Kingdom, China, and Indonesia. Most articles were published in journals focusing on lactation physiology, breastfeeding challenges, and evidence based interventions. The most cited studies emphasized the importance of partner support, coparenting, and breastfeeding safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Keyword analysis revealed several underexplored areas, particularly the role of midwives, formula use, and BSE in mothers of preterm infants Conclusion : This study highlights the growing global attention to breastfeeding self-efficacy as a key factor in improving maternal and child health, and points to the need for further research on underexplored areas, including the role of midwives and the impact of alternative feeding practices, to support more effective interventions and policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.123
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.123
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.2560.332
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Medical Journal→Same topicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences→French-language works237,207→