MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415845313 · doi:10.5194/ejm-37-841-2025

Formation of the Ertelien and Langedalen magmatic Ni–Cu sulfide deposits in Norway: investigating the evolution of platinum-group-element-depleted systems at convergent margins

2025· article· en· W4415845313 on OpenAlex
Eduardo T. Mansur, Alf André Orvik, I.H.C. Henderson, Ana Carolina Miranda, Trond Slagstad, Sarah Dare, Terje Bjerkgård, Jan Sverre Sandstad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mineralogy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsSulfidePyrrhotitePentlanditeMaficPyriteVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositMineralization (soil science)Sulfide mineralsChalcopyriteIntrusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Ertelien and Langedalen magmatic Ni–Cu sulfide deposits are hosted within mafic intrusions of the Kongsberg Lithotectonic Unit in the southwestern Fennoscandian Shield, formed in a convergent-margin tectonic setting. The Ertelien deposit occurs within a gabbronorite intrusion of approximately 600×500 m, with the main sulfide mineralization being located at the contact with the surrounding gneiss. In contrast, the Langedalen deposit consists of 1–2 m massive sulfide lenses hosted in 10–50 m gabbronorite lenses that are extensively deformed within shear zones. Sulfide mineralization in Ertelien ranges from disseminated to net-textured and massive ores, whereas Langedalen ranges primarily comprise massive sulfide lenses. A distinctive feature of Langedalen ranges is the local presence of an Au-rich quartz vein adjacent to the sulfide lenses. In both deposits, pyrrhotite is the dominant sulfide mineral, followed by pentlandite and minor chalcopyrite. Secondary pyrite is present, particularly in altered zones. This study provides a comprehensive characterization of the Ertelien and Langedalen deposits and constrains their genesis within a convergent-margin context. We analysed S, platinum group elements (PGEs), TABS+ (Te, As, Bi, Sb, Se), and other chalcophile elements in whole rocks and sulfide minerals across different ore textures, as well as U–Pb and Hf isotopes in zircon. Whole-rock geochemistry reveals a positive correlation between S and Ni, Cu, and Co, with sulfide tenors of ca. 2.2 wt % Ni, 1.5 wt % Cu, and 1200 ppm Co. Sulfides from both deposits are notably depleted in PGEs, consistently with derivation from a PGE-depleted parental magma compositionally similar to cogenetic dykes. This depletion may result from an event of prior sulfide segregation. However, we suggest that an alternative explanation is that the parental magmas were derived from a hydrous metasomatised pyroxenitic mantle source. In addition, a zircon U–Pb crystallization age of 1559±7 Ma and εHf(i) values of +3 to +5 for the Ertelien intrusion support formation during a prolonged subduction-related magmatic episode involving oceanic crust recycling. Despite post-magmatic alteration and secondary pyrite formation, sulfide minerals largely preserve their primary magmatic signatures, comparably to other Ni–Cu magmatic systems globally. However, parts of the Langedalen sulfides exhibit hydrothermal overprint, reflected in elevated concentrations of mobile elements (Te, As, Bi, Sb), likely linked to the formation of the Au-rich quartz vein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it