MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415850261 · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04003-x

Through thick and thin: nursing resilience as an adaptive psychological mechanism in the context of professional integration

2025· article· en· W4415850261 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Camille Gagnon-Béland, Stéphanie Austin, Liette St-Pierre

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersRéseau de recherche portant sur les interventions en sciences infirmières du QuébecUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Mechanism (biology)Resilience (materials science)Nursing researchNursing managementPsychological resilience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Based on the theoretical framework of self-determination theory, this study examines the links between the quality of interpersonal relationships and occupational health (vigor and emotional exhaustion), as well as the occupational functioning (affective commitment and turnover intentions) of new nurses, considering the potential role of psychological resources (satisfaction of basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness; resilience) as intermediate coping mechanisms. METHOD: The sample for this cross-sectional study comprises 273 Quebec new nurses (≤ 2 years of experience). Using the MPlus 8.8 software, a mediation analysis was performed to test the proposed adaptation model. RESULTS: The quality of interpersonal relationships at the beginning of a nursing career is linked to the satisfaction of psychological needs at work. In this regard, our results indicate that it is through the perception of competence at work that the quality of interpersonal relationships is associated with resilience. In turn, new nurses' resilience is related to occupational health (positive and significant link with vigor, negative and significant link with emotional exhaustion). In terms of the psychological resources that potentially intervene in the relationship between the quality of interpersonal relationships and the occupational functioning, our results suggest that psychological needs could play a partial mediating role. Indeed, direct and significant links are observed between the perception of competence and the occupational turnover intentions (β = - 0.226, p = .029), as well as between the perception of autonomy and affective commitment to the nursing profession (β = 0.240, p = .026). CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Positive relationships at work are a lever for professional adaptation for new nurses since they lead to the establishment of important psychological resources (competence and resilience) for their occupational health and occupational functioning. Health care institutions are therefore encouraged to strengthen harmonious, rewarding, satisfying and trusting relationships in their environments. In addition, they would benefit from directing the new nurse to the importance of their psychological resources, given their positive associations with the health and functioning indicators measured in this study. The implications of the study are discussed in light of the most recent literature on the adaptation of new nurses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.409 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NursingSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207