MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415857585 · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00091

The association of relative deprivation, interpersonal relationships, and problematic social media use in 39 countries/regions: Does school contextual inequality matter?

2025· article· en· W4415857585 on OpenAlex
Zékai Lu, Zelin Liu, Danhua Lin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Behavioral Addictions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInterpersonal communicationAssociation (psychology)Socioeconomic statusPsychological interventionInequalityInterpersonal relationshipMedia use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Social media use among adolescents has rapidly expanded, raising concerns about problematic social media use (PSMU). Few studies have examined how relative deprivation (RD) and contextual inequality shape PSMU. We explain whether four key interpersonal relationships (relationships with teachers, classmates, and family, and bullying victimization) mediate the link between RD and PSMU and whether school-level inequality moderates these associations. Method: The data was from the 2017/2018 Health Behavior in School-aged Children (190,707 adolescents, 5,576 schools, 39 countries/regions). The independent variable was RD, calculated via the Yitzhaki index, and the dependent variable was PSMU. Four interpersonal relationships (teacher, classmate, and family relationships, and bullying victimization) were assessed as mediators. Multilevel mediation models were used to evaluate the mediating roles of these relationships. We then extracted each country/region's indirect effects for cross-national comparisons. The Johnson-Neyman method was used to assess the moderating effect of contextual inequality. Results: Although RD had no direct effect on PSMU, higher RD was associated with poorer teacher, classmate, and family relationships and heightened bullying victimization. These then predicted increased PSMU. Contextual inequality strengthened RD's adverse association with family relationships and magnified the associations of family relationships and bullying on PSMU. Cross-national analyses revealed stable mediating effects of teacher and classmate relationships. Conclusions: We highlight RD's associations with PSMU primarily through interpersonal pathways, with contextual inequality amplifying them. Targeted interventions that address both socioeconomic disparities and interpersonal dynamics can help mitigate PSMU. These outcomes underscore the need for policies that reduce economic gaps and foster supportive relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it