Analysis of Malate and Other Di- and Tricarboxylic Acids Using Capillary Electrophoresis and Laser-Induced Photoluminescence Detection After Complexation with Europium Tetracycline
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fumarate, succinate, maleate, dihydroxyfumarate, D–tartarate, L–tartarate, DL–tartarate, L-malate, D-malate, oxaloacetate, citrate, and DL-isocitrate in the 5–100 μM concentration range were incubated in 12.5 mM HEPES/25 mM TRIS base containing 200 μM Eu3+–tetracycline and 60% (v/v) formamide (pH unadjusted). After 30 min of incubation, they were separated at 4 °C by capillary electrophoresis utilizing laser-induced luminescence detection with 12.5 mM HEPES/25 mM TRIS base containing 60% formamide as the running buffer. All analytes yielded peaks, with the exception of fumarate, succinate, and maleate. L-Malate was detected down to 100 nM. The main component of this study was the analysis of malate. The objective was to develop a stereoselective methodology for the detection of L-malate. This was achieved by varying the formamide concentration and separation temperature. When the temperature was increased to 22 °C and the formamide concentration decreased to 40%, the sensitivity for L-malate was diminished about 10-fold, but that for D-malate was eliminated. This combination of conditions allowed for the stereospecific analysis of L-malate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it