MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415871985 · doi:10.3390/jrfm18110616

Sustainable Environmental Governance and Corporate Environmental Performance: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Companies

2025· article· en· W4415871985 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jihene Chedlia Soussi, Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi, Neef Alwadani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPrince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
KeywordsSustainabilitySustainability reportingCorporate governanceSustainability organizationsEnvironmental Sustainability IndexStakeholderAccountabilitySustainable developmentIndex (typography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the internal governance mechanisms of sustainability and their influence on corporate environmental performance (CEP) from 2014 to 2021 in Saudi Arabia. The analysis centers on three primary mechanisms: the presence of a sustainability committee, issuance of sustainability reports, and external assurance of these reports. Utilizing a sample of 188 firm-year observations from publicly listed companies, we evaluate each mechanism and their combined effect as predictors of CEP through ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis. We constructed a composite index of sustainability governance practices to assess the overall governance strength of the firm, referred to as the sustainability index. Our findings indicate that, while sustainability external assurance is positively associated with CEP, it is statistically insignificant. By contrast, the positive correlations of sustainability committees and sustainability reports with CEP were significant. The overall sustainable mechanisms’ composite index in the regression positively influences corporate environmental performance. This suggests that the composite sustainability index is more effective than individual sustainability mechanisms because of its complementary functions. This study aims to advance theories related to emerging markets in which institutional arrangements and stakeholder demands differ from those in developed countries. These results emphasize on the importance of corporate boards and policymakers in establishing dedicated sustainability committees, enhancing reporting quality, and integrating various governance systems to improve environmental performance which, in turn, promote responsible corporate behavior and ensure accountability towards environmental protection and sustainable development. This aligns with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals, specifically Goals 12 and 13.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial managementSame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207