MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prevention and harm reduction of obesity (clinical prevention)

2025· review· en· W4415874558 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zaheer Bayat, Jeanne Lübbe, M Conradie-Smit, Willie E. May

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth African Medical Journal · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersObesity Canada
KeywordsPsychosocialObesityWeight gainPsychological interventionHarmPrimary careHealth careWeight loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY MESSAGES FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS • Obesity is a complex chronic disease in which abnormal or excess body fat (adiposity) impairs health, increases the risk of long-term medical complications, and reduces lifespan. • Obesity arises from a complex interplay of genetic, biological, behavioural, psychosocial and environmental factors, and can develop via slow and steady weight gain over an extended period, or from rapid bursts of weight gain. • Obesity prevention should take place in a range of settings that access whole populations or high-risk groups. The individual-based approach to prevention is primarily used by healthcare providers and targets those with the highest level of risk of obesity. The population-based approach addresses the behavioural, sociocultural and environmental factors that contribute to non-communicable diseases in populations, including obesity. • Primary care clinicians have an important role in early identification of people living with obesity. Regular assessments of body weight are needed to catch early weight gain. (See the chapters 'Assessment of people living with obesity' and 'Primary care and primary healthcare in obesity management'.) • Primary care clinicians should initiate discussion around weight gain early and contemplate interventions that consider its complex causes, providing guidance beyond 'eat less and move more'. • Many medications are associated with weight gain side-effects that can contribute to long-term weight gain. The risks and benefits of such medications should be weighed up for each specific person before prescribing. • Excess pregnancy weight gain and post-pregnancy weight retention are significantly reduced with behavioural interventions. Primary care clinicians should counsel women attending prenatal care not to exceed pregnancy weight gain guidelines, in the course of dietary, physical activity and psychological interventions during prenatal visits. • Health benefits of smoking cessation outweigh the cardiovascular consequences associated with smoking cessation-related weight gain. • Short-term behavioural interventions (generally 6 months or less) aimed at preventing weight gain during young adulthood, menopause, smoking cessation and breast cancer treatment have not yet been shown to be effective. • Longer-term interventions are likely to be needed to properly examine strategies for preventing weight gain for many of these high-risk groups and in the general population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth African Medical JournalSame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207