Novoe Biksenteevo Hoards: Typology and X-ray Fluorescence Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2022—2024, research in the Eastern Cross-Kama area in the territory of the Novoye Biksenteevo village revealed two hoards of bronze items from the Lomovatovskaya culture: 54 items in the first hoard and 12 in the second, a significant portion of which consisted of composite rattling jewelry. X-ray fluorescence analysis of these finds was carried out at the Collective Use Centre of IA RAS. Most of the items were made of tin-lead and tin bronze; in several items, the increased content of aluminum and zinc was recorded. A considerable variation in the percentage of the main impurities indicates that a significant part of the items were subjected to repeated remelting after their breakage. Most of the items were made of tin-lead and tin bronze, with the increased content of aluminum and zinc documented in a number of items. A considerable variation in the percentage of the main impurities indicates that a significant part of the items was subjected to repeated remelting after their breakage. Most of the jewelry items date back to the 7th century and find close analogies in female ornaments of the Permian Finnic cultures. The latest finds allow dating these hoards to the turn of the 7th—8th centuries or the first quarter of the 8th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".