Developing interferon-β as a safe in vivo experimental-medicine model of human inflammation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation is increasingly implicated in a wide range of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders from depression to dementia. Compelling evidence for an inflammatory role in these disorders includes experimental-medicine studies with IFN-α and endotoxin, alongside therapeutic benefits observed with anti-cytokine agents. AIM: To develop and characterise a new, safe in-vivo mild inflammatory response that is titratable, elicits robust host sickness manifestations within an experimentally tractable timeframe, and has minimal cardiovascular effects, avoiding the requirement for continuous cardiac monitoring and ensuring applicability across diverse experimental contexts and participant groups, from the young to the elderly. METHODS: Using a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, repeated measures cross-over design, physiological, behavioural, cytokine, cellular and transcriptomic immune responses were collected from 30 healthy volunteers (15 young (18-34) and 15 older (60-75) years) on two separate occasions, once after 100 µg subcutaneous IFN-β (EXTAVIA®) and once after subcutaneous saline (placebo) injection. RESULTS: IFN-β increased ∼15-fold at 4 h and 9-fold at 6½ hours and rapidly induced anticipated increases in negative mood, tiredness, tension and sickness symptoms and reduced vigour (all p < 0.01) without serious side effects. It was associated with a modest increase in temperature (mean: +1.1C) and heart rate (mean: +11 bpm) but no change in blood-pressure or cardiovascular instability. IL-6, TNF-α, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and monocyte count all showed significant increases (all p < 0.05). Transcriptomic analyses confirmed activation of classical Interferon signalling pathways as well as Toll-like Receptor (TLR), Inflammasome, Pyroptosis, MyD88 and a variety of other host response pathways that have been implicated in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric or neurodegenerative disorders. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-β is a safe, robust new experimental model of mild inflammation that can be safely used to induce transient changes in systemic inflammation in healthy individuals from 18-75 years. Modulation of diverse immunological processes suggests it could be a valuable new experimental medicine tool across neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".