MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415881079 · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.001543

Population structure of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis provides new insights into genomic evolution

2025· article· en· W4415881079 on OpenAlexafffund
Idowu B. Olawoye, David Alexander, Jennifer L. Guthrie

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobial Genomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioManitoba HealthUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGenetic diversityGenomePathogenOpportunistic pathogenPopulationHuman pathogenPhylogeneticsPopulation structureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(MAH) is a clinically important species of non-tuberculous mycobacteria that causes infections in a variety of hosts. This opportunistic pathogen is widespread in the environment, including natural and engineered water systems across the globe. To examine the current genetic diversity of this organism, we analysed 702 MAH genomes isolated from humans, pigs and environmental sources across six countries and three continents. Through Bayesian population structure analysis, we identified ten distinct global lineages, including seven previously described and three new ones. Several lineages exhibited regional clustering, including sequence cluster 6 (SC6) in Germany and SC8 in both the USA and Germany. Further analysis identified recombination hotspots in membrane proteins associated with virulence, antimicrobial resistance and immune modulation, driven by insertion sequences and other elements that frequently integrate at tRNA gene sites. This work demonstrates the remarkable genomic diversity of MAH and provides insight into the evolutionary mechanisms that contribute to its success as a pathogen in both humans and animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobial GenomicsSame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207