Parent body thermal metamorphism of enstatite chondrites: Disentangling the effects of shock melting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Enstatite chondrites (ECs) formed on at least two parent bodies, EH and EL. After the accretion of the EC parent bodies, EC material was subjected to varying degrees of parent body thermal metamorphism (measured by petrologic types 3–6), due to heat released by radioactive isotope decay. Current schemes to determine the petrologic type of the ECs are qualitative and ambiguous, and many studies have included known or misclassified shock‐melted ECs, which altogether have led to inconsistent classifications. In this study, we attempt to distinguish shock‐melted ECs from other ECs so that we can assess the effects of thermal metamorphism alone. We identified a suite of geochemical parameters that allow us to classify rapidly cooled, quenched shock‐melt ECs, including high‐Fe (Mg,Mn,Fe)S monosulfide, high‐Cr troilite, and high‐Ni kamacite. We then screened out shock‐melted samples. This then allowed us to establish a quantitative scheme to determine the petrologic type of an EC. This classification scheme is based on the petrography and geochemistry of glass, silicate minerals, sulfides, and metal. Specifically, for EH chondrites (which are similar but distinct from the EL group), among other parameters, the size and abundance of feldspar progressively increase from EH3 to EH6 (<13 μm, <8.5% modal% to >13 μm, 11.5 modal%), while the FeO content of enstatite changes from types 3–4 to types 5–6 (<0.45 wt% to >0.45 wt%). Additionally, we build on the work of others to propose a scheme that subdivides the EH3. Using the average Cr 2 O 3 content of olivine, we divide the EH3 and EH4 chondrites into EH3 Low (mean Cr 2 O 3 > 0.25 wt%) and EH3 High ‐EH4 subtypes (Cr 2 O 3 < 0.25 wt%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".