MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415884220 · doi:10.1109/mass66014.2025.00100

Lightweight Group Handover for Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)

2025· article· W4415884220 on OpenAlexaff
Oylum Gerenli, Güneş Karabulut Kurt, Enver Ozdemır

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandoverDroneAuthentication (law)Cellular networkProcess (computing)Simple (philosophy)Soft handover

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, are widely deployed and often transmit sensitive data via cellular networks, Wi-Fi, or device-to-device (D2D) communication frameworks. Due to their aerial mobility, UAVs are well-suited for a wide range of applications such as military missions, cargo transport, mapping, and agricultural monitoring. However, securing their communications remains a significant challenge. Their continuous movement and frequent data transmissions make secure authentication difficult to maintain, especially as UAVs often need to switch between different network cells during flight. For example, a drone initially connected to cell A may need to handover to cell B as it progresses along its route. This study is designed to present new authentication and handover processes for multiple nodes within a predefined group. The proposed method makes the group handover process simple and low-cost, while also being resistant to various security threats. Compared to a previous handover scheme based on elliptic curves and Lagrange interpolation, the proposed method, leveraging inner product space, demonstrates significantly improved performance. The corresponding test results are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207