MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415893946 · doi:10.1186/s41479-025-00180-0

Existence and relevance of fulminant severe community-acquired pneumonia

2025· article· en· W4415893946 on OpenAlexaff
Francesco Salton, Jesús Villar, Michele Mondoni, Sergio Harari, Andrea Salotti, Alfonso Ambrós, Francisco Alba, Carlos Ferrando, Tomás Muñoz, Juan A. Soler, Lina Pérez‐Méndez, Cristina Fernández, Domingo Antonio Sánchez Martínez, Stefano Gasparotto, Stefano Centanni, Umberto Zuccon, Giulia Barbati, Andrea Rocca, Barbara Ruaro, Marco Confalonieri, Paola Confalonieri

Bibliographic record

VenuePneumonia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos III
KeywordsFulminantARDSPneumoniaIncidence (geometry)SepsisRespiratory failureSeptic shockRetrospective cohort studyRespiratory distress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is a major contributor to global hospital mortality, with some patients rapidly progressing to death within a few days due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, or multiorgan failure (MOFS). Despite the significant health burden, these cases remain poorly defined, often overlooked in clinical practice, and insufficiently addressed in existing guidelines. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed 1,517 hospitalized patients with sCAP for assessing the incidence of fulminant pneumonia -defined as sCAP leading to death within 7 days from hospital admission- and to identify factors associated with either an increased or reduced risk of unfavorable outcome. RESULTS: Our findings revealed a 5.9% incidence of fulminant pneumonia, with early death primarily due to ARDS (93%), sepsis (70%), and MOFS (73%). Older age, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and elevated serum creatinine were associated with increased risk, while early corticosteroid administration was associated with a significant mortality reduction within seven days, both in the univariate and multivariate analyses (OR 0.22, CI 95% 0.12–0.38, p < 0.001). Baseline respiratory impairment and inflammatory markers were not associated with early mortality. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of recognizing sCAP as a time-dependent condition, requiring early identification and treatment of cases at risk for developing fulminant pneumonia at hospital admission. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these findings and optimize treatment strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06516601.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePneumoniaSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207