Engineering Polyketide Stereocenters with Ketoreductase Domain Exchanges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyketide synthases (PKSs) are versatile biosynthetic megasynthases capable of producing a diverse range of natural products with many applications, including in pharmaceuticals. The stereochemical precision of PKSs makes them a powerful tool for engineering tailored, unnatural polyketides; however, modifying the stereocenters of a PKS product while maintaining production levels remains a significant challenge. In this study, we systematically tested and evaluated strategies for ketoreductase (KR) domain exchanges, the domain responsible for setting stereocenters of polyketide products. After first optimizing the method for KR exchanges, we then performed 44 KR domain exchanges on three different PKSs to obtain high production of all four stereoisomers in vivo. By testing both one- and two-module PKS systems, we investigated how downstream modules process intermediates with altered stereochemistry and found that the configuration of the α-substituents was critical for gatekeeping by the ketosynthase (KS). To overcome this constraint, we investigated two different strategies for altering the KS domain, including introducing targeted mutations in the downstream KS, and exploring boundaries in exchanging the entire functional unit from the donor PKS. Both strategies successfully modified the KS stereocontrol with distinct trade-offs; the functional unit exchange resulted in higher titer improvements, though it was more likely to break the entire PKS. This study demonstrates a comprehensive approach to successfully engineering all four stereochemical configurations in multiple PKS systems, advancing our understanding of and ability to rationally modify polyketide stereochemistry through multiple engineering strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".