MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

128 Enabling sensitive and reproducible functional profiling for immuno-oncology research on the CyTOF XT PRO mass cytometer

2025· article· W4415898660 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Li, Rita Straus, Michael Sullivan, Michael R. Cohen, Lauren J. Tracey, Christina Loh, Alexander Loboda

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)Mass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Reproducible immune profiling is crucial for translational and clinical research and for developing accurate prognoses and effective treatments. Reproducibly identifying low-expressing targets and rare functional populations is challenging with fluorescence flow cytometry due to spectral spillover, autofluorescence and unmixing errors, issues not present with mass cytometry. Further, multiple workflows in mass cytometry provide flexibility and minimize technical variation, including the abilities to freeze metal-tagged antibody cocktails, barcode samples and freeze stained samples for future acquisition. The goal of this study was to assess the consistency and robustness of mass cytometry across various staining and acquisition workflows.Methods Human whole blood and PBMC samples were stained with antibody panels containing up to 50 surface and intracellular markers for phenotyping and functional profiling via checkpoint markers and cytokines. Stained samples were frozen and acquired on a later date using three CyTOF™ XT PRO and three CyTOF XT systems to assess repeatability and reproducibility, and to ensure data quality was not compromised when samples were acquired at 2x and 4x speeds with the CyTOF XT PRO system.Results Both systems were highly repeatable and reproducible across multiple instruments. Cell population frequencies and signal intensities were not significantly different between the two CyTOF systems. Both systems had high sensitivity and dynamic range for abundant and low-abundance markers to accurately identify T helper cell populations. Furthermore, opt-SNE analysis revealed that the enhanced throughput of the CyTOF XT PRO system retained clear visualization of major immune subsets and striking functional diversity in high-dimensional space.Conclusions Overall, these studies demonstrate that CyTOF XT and CyTOF XT PRO systems generate highly repeatable and reproducible data. Moreover, the CyTOF XT PRO system enables acquisition at up to 4x increased event rate without compromising data quality. Automated acquisition by the CyTOF XT PRO system enables researchers to accurately and reproducibly streamline human immunophenotyping and functional profiling, leading to accelerated biological insights and discoveries.For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207