Effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the left DLPFC on cognitive function and inflammatory markers in post-stroke cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) combined with cognitive training in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), and to investigate its effects on systemic inflammatory biomarkers: homocysteine (Hcy), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Methods: In this single-center, randomized, sham-controlled trial, 69 PSCI patients received 4 weeks of daily cognitive training combined with either real iTBS (target: left DLPFC; 1200 pulses per session at 80 % of resting motor threshold, total 20 sessions) or sham stimulation. Assessments were conducted at baseline (week 0) and week 4, including measures of global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]), executive function (Frontal Assessment Battery [FAB]), activities of daily living (Barthel Index [BI]), domain-specific cognitive subscores (forward/backward digit span [FDS/BDS], delayed recall, attention), and inflammatory biomarkers (Hcy, CRP, LDH). Data were analyzed using two-way mixed General Linear Models (GLM) to assess main and interaction effects of Time and Group. Results: Significant Time effects were observed for all cognitive and biochemical measures (p < 0.001), indicating overall improvement after intervention. Significant Time × Group interactions favored the iTBS group for MMSE, MoCA, BI, FDS, BDS (p < 0.05), suggesting enhanced gains in global cognition, executive function, and working memory. Serum LDH showed a greater reduction in the iTBS group (p < 0.05), while decreases in Hcy and CRP were comparable between groups. Correlation analysis revealed that reductions in LDH and Hcy were significantly associated with improvements in MMSE, MoCA, FAB, and working-memory subscores in the iTBS group (r = -0.334 to -0.525, p < 0.05), supporting a metabolic-cognitive coupling effect. Conclusions: iTBS applied to the left DLPFC, combined with cognitive training, produces superior improvements in global cognition, executive function, and daily living ability compared with cognitive training alone in PSCI patients. The concomitant reduction in LDH suggests potential anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective mechanisms underlying these cognitive benefits. LDH may thus serve as a sensitive peripheral biomarker for neuromodulation-induced recovery in PSCI rehabilitation. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2300076109.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".