MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415908454 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202533908002

Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collision at 27 and 54.4 GeV

2025· article· en· W4415908454 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonHadronVirtual particleRadiationTransverse planeQuantum chromodynamicsThermalBremsstrahlung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As electromagnetic probes, photons have the advantage of escaping unimpeded from their emission source, allowing them to carry valuable information about the properties and dynamics of the hot quantum chromodynamics (QCD) medium created in heavy-ion collisions. Particularly, the transverse momentum distribution of direct virtual photons emitted from the hot QCD medium exhibits sensitivity to the system temperature. Direction photons from thermal radiation in the low transverse momentum region are expected to be a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) thermometer. However, the photon from hadronic decays make the extraction of the thermal radiation contribution very challenging. The STAR experiment has recorded large datasets of Au+Au collisions in the Beam Energy Scan Phase-II (BES-II) program, spanning center-of-mass energies of √ s NN = 3 - 54.4 GeV. In these proceedings, we present the latest direct virtual photon measurement in Au+Au collisions at √ s NN = 27 and 54.4 GeV, including p T differential invariant yields and total yields in different centrality bin. The total yields increase rapidly with increasing dN ch / d η. Notably, it scales with ( dN ch / d η) α , where α = 1.46 ± 0.07.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207