MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415923515 · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000002654

The burden of sleep disturbances on quality of life and mental well-being in nearly 50,000 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with and without concurrent vasomotor symptoms from the United States and Europe

2025· article· en· W4415923515 on OpenAlexaff
Cláudio N. Soares, Paula Briggs, Carina Dinkel-Keuthage, Nils Schoof, Carsten Möeller, Joehl Nguyen, Kelly R. Genga, Sheila Drakeley, Kushal Modi, Pauline M. Maki

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersBayer
KeywordsVasomotorPostmenopausal womenSleep (system call)Quality of life (healthcare)MenopauseSleep disorder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the burden of sleep disturbances on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental well-being in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with/without co-occurring vasomotor symptoms (VMS). METHODS: Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years who participated in the National Health and Wellness 2019/2021 (US; N=27,621) and 2017/2020 cross-sectional surveys (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK; N=20,220) were included. Patient-reported outcomes were HRQoL (Short-Form Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale, EQ-5D-5L), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 assessment). Associations between self-reported sleep disturbances and/or VMS and study outcomes were evaluated using generalized multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Among perimenopausal women, sleep disturbances were reported by 61.7% (US) and 60.6% (Europe) with VMS, and 38.0% (US) and 40.8% (Europe) without VMS. Among postmenopausal women, sleep disturbances were reported by 66.7% (US) and 63.4% (Europe) with VMS, and 44.5% (US) and 40.9% (Europe) without VMS. Compared with women with neither symptom, perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with sleep disturbances had worse HRQoL ( P <0.001) and higher (worse) depression and anxiety scores ( P <0.05 perimenopausal, P <0.001 postmenopausal) irrespective of VMS. In addition, among postmenopausal women, those with sleep disturbances alone had worse HRQoL and higher (worse) depression and anxiety scores than those with VMS alone ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbance was common among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women irrespective of VMS, and independently associated with negative effects on HRQoL, depression, and anxiety. Effective treatments for sleep disturbances and VMS in menopausal women are needed to mitigate the associated burden and improve well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause SocietySame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207