MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415926597 · doi:10.1177/18758894251391909

ICF-based functioning profiles in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: Evidence from a population-based study in Argentina

2025· article· en· W4415926597 on OpenAlexaff
María de las Mercedes Ruiz Brünner, Eduardo Cuestas, María Elisabeth Cieri, Ana Laura Condinanzi, Carolina Ayllón, Verónica Schiariti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)International Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthMotor skillTypically developingActivities of daily livingMotor activity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: In Argentina, there is no consensus on the functional assessment of children with cerebral palsy (CP). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for children with CP are tools that standardize clinical functional assessments. The aim was to build functioning profiles of children with CP aged 2 to 18 years in eight Argentine cities, to identify their functional needs and contribute to improving assessment processes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study, developed in stages. This article describes the last stage, the creation of the functional profile of a sample surveyed in eight cities. Twenty-five categories established in the common abbreviated core set of CP were evaluated through the application of a protocol called PC-CIFuncional (previously created). This protocol consists of scales or culturally sensitive instruments, assessed through clinical evaluations and questionnaires for children and families. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three functioning profiles were built using the previously developed PC-CIFuncional protocol. Of the participants, 52.7% had severe motor compromise with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV and V. In children at GMFCS level IV-V, most categories in activities and participation-including recreation, communication and physical activity-showed severe limitations and restrictions, compared with their peers. The use of technology for daily living and mobility in children with less motor compromise (GMFCS level I-III) was neither a facilitator nor a barrier, but in children with greater compromise it was a complete facilitator. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in functional needs were identified in children with CP according to motor involvement. This project standardizes the identification of functional needs and therapeutic goals based on ICF language, creating novel functioning profiles in Argentina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Rehabilitation MedicineSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207