MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ambient and high-temperature rotating bending fatigue of as-built and hot isostatic pressed additively manufactured 316L stainless steel

2025· article· en· W4415929433 on OpenAlexafffund
Yahya Aghayar, Alireza Behvar, Md Naimur Rahman Antu, Maryam Avateffazeli, Meysam Haghshenas, Mohsen Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Fatigue · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyUniversity of New Brunswick
KeywordsHot isostatic pressingElectron backscatter diffractionEquiaxed crystalsFatigue limitPorosityStriationDuctility (Earth science)Dislocation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• HIP removed porosity and raised Σ3 twins in PBF-LB_SS316L from 2.4 % to 33 %. • At 450 °C, HIP improved fatigue endurance (170 MPa vs. 130 MPa as-built). • HIP increased ductility but lowered the fatigue limit to 220 MPa from 240 MPa. • As-built formed many cracks, while HIP formed a single stable crack. • EBSD showed grain coarsening at 450 °C; HIP preserved microstructural stability. This study investigates the effects of Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) on the rotating bending fatigue (RBF) performance of Powder Bed Fused-Laser Beam (PBF-LB) 316L stainless steel (SS316L) at both room (25 °C) and elevated temperatures (450 °C). HIP was applied at 1150 °C and 100 MPa for 4 h following stress relief to eliminate porosity and homogenize the microstructure. Advanced microstructural characterization revealed that HIP reduced porosity below detection limits and transformed the melt-pool structure into an equiaxed grain morphology with a significant increase in Σ3 twin boundary fraction (∼2.4 % to 33 %). These changes were accompanied by reduced dislocation density and internal strain. Fatigue testing showed that HIP specimens exhibited superior high-temperature fatigue endurance (170 MPa) compared to as-built samples (130 MPa), due to defect elimination and microstructural stabilization. However, at 25 °C, as-built specimens outperformed HIP ones (240 MPa vs. 220 MPa) owing to retained work-hardened microstructures. Fractographic analysis confirmed these trends: multiple crack initiation sites dominated as-built failures, while HIP fractures showed single-origin cracks with striation growth. Post-fatigue electron backscatter diffraction maps revealed temperature-dependent grain coarsening and dislocation accumulation, particularly in the as-built samples. Overall, HIP significantly enhanced the high-temperature fatigue resistance of PBF-LB_SS316L by improving microstructural integrity and delaying crack initiation, highlighting the importance of post-processing in AM components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of FatigueSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207