MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415929610 · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2025.119612

A review of rubidium: Resources, technologies, and applications

2025· article· en· W4415929610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesalination · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCentral South University
KeywordsRubidiumElectrowinningSustainable developmentPhotovoltaic systemResource (disambiguation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rubidium (Rb), as a rare alkali metal, exhibits unique physicochemical properties, such as ease of ionization, ultra-precise stability of atomic transition frequencies, and excellent photoelectric response, which have led to its significant application in various cutting-edge fields, including photocatalysis, photovoltaic materials, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) power generation, rubidium atomic clocks, specialty glass, pharmaceuticals, pyrotechnics, and quantum computer. With advancements in technology and industrial upgrades, the global demand for rubidium is rapidly increasing, driving the development of rubidium resources, innovation in extraction technologies, and the expansion of applications. This paper provides a systematic review of rubidium's fundamental properties, mineral types, resource occurrence, global distribution, technological progress, and market landscape, offering a full industrial-chain overview over time. It particularly evaluates the characteristics of solid and liquid rubidium resources and the challenges encountered in their development and utilization. In terms of metallurgical technologies, the paper summarizes the current mainstream extraction and separation processes, including acid leaching, roasting, hydrothermal treatment, ion exchange, solvent extraction, and electrochemical separation. These methods are analyzed comprehensively from the perspectives of technical feasibility, energy consumption, environmental impact, and economic efficiency, while also reflecting on interdisciplinary integration, technological convergence, cross-field learning, and future development directions. Additionally, this paper outlines the current status and development trends of rubidium applications in various high-tech fields, exploring the interrelationships among resources, technology, and applications and their role in supporting the sustainable development of the rubidium industry. Through interdisciplinary analysis, this study aims to provide scientific guidance and practical reference for the strategic planning and technological evolution of the global rubidium industry. • Reviewed rubidium's physicochemical properties and related application fields. • Global distribution and types of rubidium resources, along with market status. • Comprehensive assessment of technological advancements in rubidium metallurgy. • Comparison of advantages, disadvantages, and applicability of different technologies. • Outlook on the future development direction of rubidium resource extraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it