MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Online motion planning and control for autonomous on-orbit assembly with machine learning-based model predictive control

2025· article· en· W4415930366 on OpenAlexafffund
Siavash Tavana, Sepideh Faghihi, Anton de Ruiter, Krishna Dev Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Astronautica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic HospitalToronto Zoo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlMotion planningOnline modelGeneralizationComputationSet (abstract data type)Robotic spacecraftSpacecraftMotion controlRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The future of space exploration missions highly depends on autonomous space systems. To move toward autonomy, the development of online motion planners becomes a priority, where the Model Predictive Control framework is superior in this domain. At the same time, machine learning techniques open up new horizons for designing autonomous systems. This paper proposes a novel method integrating machine learning techniques with model predictive control to perform on-orbit assembly autonomously using a robotic spacecraft. In this work, a set of machine learning models, trained using the datasets obtained from the high-fidelity model developed in our previous research, are proposed to predict a set of optimization parameters in the large-scale optimal control problem to accelerate computations for online planning. More specifically, the proposed machine learning architecture is trained on a dataset generated from the shape, size, position, and orientation of space structures present in the assembly environment to predict the closest point on space structures with respect to others; hence the minimum distance. This approach reduces the number of optimization parameters in the respective optimal control problems and speeds up computations drastically. The resulting machine learning models are later utilized within a model predictive control’s prediction horizon to propose fast online motion planners. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed architecture maintains a small generalization error in computing and tracking distance between objects. Finally, the online motion planners are applied to an autonomous on-orbit assembly operation using a robotic spacecraft to show the efficiency and capability of the proposed approach. • Online motion planning and control for autonomous on-orbit assembly. • Nonlinear model predictive control for online motion planning and control of robotic spacecraft. • Machine Learning incorporation into model predictive control for motion planning and control. • Contributing to proximity operations and space exploration technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa AstronauticaSame topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207