MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415937650 · doi:10.2196/79731

The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Engagement—How Digital Access and Internet Use Reshape Sleep Schedules and Underlying Mechanisms in Older Adults: Longitudinal Observational Study

2025· article· en· W4415937650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chi Zhang, Lang-Dong Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Aging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology Use by Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)Observational studyThe InternetNapInternet accessSWORD

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Given the rapid development of the digital economy and the sustained proliferation of the internet, digital engagement in older adults has garnered mounting attention from the academic community. However, research has yet to systematically examine the impact of digital engagement on sleep in this demographic. Objective: This study aims to examine the association of digital engagement-operationalized as digital access and internet use duration-with the sleep schedules (nocturnal sleep duration, afternoon nap duration, and sleep onset time) of older adults in China, using longitudinal data and robust statistical modeling to explore longitudinal associations and potential mechanisms. Methods: Data were derived from 4 waves (2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020) of the China Family Panel Studies, involving 16,784 older adults (≥60 y). We used panel fixed effects models and a random-effects ordered logit model to analyze the effects on continuous outcomes (nocturnal and nap sleep duration), controlling for time-invariant individual characteristics. As sleep onset time is an ordinal variable, a random-effects ordered logit model was used for this outcome. Moderation analyses were conducted by introducing interaction terms (digital engagement×sex and digital engagement×residence) into the models to examine heterogeneity across subgroups (urban or rural, men or women). Mediation analyses were performed using the Sobel test with year-fixed effects and the nonparametric bootstrap method (1000 resamples) to assess the significance of indirect effects via mechanistic pathways (nonfarm employment, protein intake, memory, depressive mood, and instrumental activities of daily living). Results: The study included a total of 16,784 older adults, with an average age of 69 (SE 6.946) years, including 9100 (54.22%) women and 7684 (45.78%) men. The results showed that both digital access (β=-.15, 95% CI -.25 to -.06; P=.002) and internet use time (β=-.07, 95% CI -.13 to -.01; P=.027) were significantly associated with significantly shorter sleep duration of older adults. Digital access was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the length of afternoon naps among older adults, while internet use did not have this effect; both digital access and internet use were significantly associated with a significant delay in older adults' sleep onset time. Digital access was associated with older adults' sleep schedules through its correlations with nonfarm employment, protein intake, memory, depressive mood, and instrumental activities of daily living. Digital access had a greater and more significant impact on men and urban older adults, while internet use had a greater and more significant impact on women and urban older adults. Conclusions: The study indicates that digital engagement, such as the use of electronic devices, is associated with a reduction in both daily and nap sleep duration, as well as a delay in sleep onset, among older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR AgingSame topicTechnology Use by Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207