MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415943972 · doi:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2025.100639

Machine learning-based predictive model for atrial arrhythmia following transcatheter atrial septal defect closure

2025· article· en· W4415943972 on OpenAlexaff
Xander Jacquemyn, Alexander Van De Bruaene, Joris Ector, Peter Haemers, Pieter De Meester, Cedric Manlhiot, Werner Budts, Bert Vandenberk

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisk stratificationClosure (psychology)Atrial fibrillationClinical PracticeElectrocardiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial septal defects (ASDs) are frequently closed percutaneously. Despite successful closure, many patients still develop atrial arrhythmias. There is inconsistent data on the risk factors associated with these atrial arrhythmias. As such, we aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model predicting atrial arrhythmias following transcatheter ASD closure in adolescents and adults. Patients with secundum-type ASDs undergoing transcatheter closure between 2008-2024 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with prior atrial arrhythmias were excluded. A deep neural network, adapted via transfer learning from a large external ECG dataset, was used to extract predictive features from preprocedural 12-lead ECGs. These features were combined with clinical, demographic, biochemical and hemodynamic variables in ensemble survival models. Model performance was assessed using the integrated Brier scores and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). A total of 148 adult patients (median 44.4 years [30.6–57.8], 105 females [70.9%]) were eligible for included. There were a total of 1055 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up 7.3 [3.1–11.3]), during which 28 patients (18.9%) developed atrial arrhythmias. The final ensemble ML model incorporating ECG-derived features demonstrated strong predictive performance (integrated Brier score 0.044, mean AUC 0.823). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model across various patient profiles. We developed a novel ML-based risk model using a transfer learning approach to predict atrial arrhythmias after transcatheter ASD closure. Further research and external validation are needed to refine the proposed risk stratification prior to clinical implementation. • Following closure, a significant proportion of patients with atrial septal defects (ASDs) still develop late-onset atrial arrhythmias. • Existing prediction models for late-onset atrial arrhythmias after ASD closure have limited accuracy and clinical utility. • Our study introduces a novel, high-performing ML model, leveraging transfer learning on ECG data, to accurately predict new-onset atrial arrhythmias following transcatheter ASD closure. • ECG-derived features outperform traditional clinical and hemodynamic predictors in risk stratification. • The model shows strong and consistent predictive performance across diverse patient subgroups, supporting the model’s potential generalizability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart DiseaseSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207