Temporal Dynamics of Antigen-Specific T Cell Expansion in Primary SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Quantifying T cell response during primary infection in humans is crucial for understanding adaptive immunity. Leveraging a controlled human challenge to SARS-CoV-2, we characterized antigen-specific T cell response within and across individuals. Notably, individual clones reached similar maximum frequencies despite differences in the timing of their peak expansion. Mathematical modeling showed that this observation is consistent with precursor frequency, but not TCR signal strength, as the source of inter-clonal variability. Single-cell profiling revealed distinct temporal programs for CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, with CD4 + cells expanding earlier but contracting to a lower frequency. Clones with similar receptors, likely recognizing the same antigen, expanded at similar times. Together, these findings highlight how clone-intrinsic properties such as precursor frequency and lineage shape T cell clonal kinetics. These insights provide a quantitative framework for understanding T cell response in humans, with implications for vaccine design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".