MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415945354 · doi:10.1136/rapm-2025-107162

Analgesic efficacy of continuous superficial parasternal intercostal plane blockade in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy: a randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4415945354 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tim Ting Han Jen, Christopher Prabhakar, Pamela-Jane Matras, Kevin Rondi, Simon Bruce, Terri Sun, Nicola Edwards, Sachin Mehta, Stephan Schwarz, Anthony Chau, Ronald M. Ree

Bibliographic record

VenueRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreProvidence Health Care
FundersCanadian Anesthesiologists' Society
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialParasternal lineBlockadeCardiac surgeryAnalgesicIntercostal space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Single-injection superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blockade provides an effective and low-risk analgesic option for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with sternotomy, but their duration is limited. We sought to evaluate whether continuous SPIP blockade, compared with single-injection SPIP blockade, reduces acute sternal pain on coughing at 24 hours after cardiac surgery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled parallel-arm superiority trial at a tertiary care center in Vancouver, BC, Canada. We included English-speaking adult patients undergoing scheduled cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy. We randomized participants in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control groups, stratified by sex, using permuted block randomization with variable block sizes of 4 or 6. Patients in both study groups received bilateral SPIP catheters, with a 20 mL bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% through each catheter followed by a 3 mL/hour infusion of study solution (ropivacaine 0.2% in the intervention group and normal saline in the control group) for 48 hours. All patients received standardized multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) sternal pain score on standardized coughing at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included sternal pain within 48 hours, opioid use, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea or vomiting and chronic sternal pain. Patients, healthcare providers, outcome collectors and data analysts were blinded to group allocation. RESULTS: Eighty patients were randomized (n=40 per group). Mean (SD) sternal pain (NRS) scores on coughing at 24 hours were 4.0 (2.2) in the intervention group versus 3.9 (2.2) in the control group. The adjusted mean difference was -0.2 (95% CI -1.7 to 1.3; p=0.79). There were no differences between the groups in secondary outcomes. One patient in the intervention group experienced suspected local anesthetic systemic toxicity requiring unblinding. No other major complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous SPIP blockade did not demonstrate superiority over single-injection SPIP blockade in reducing acute sternal pain on coughing at 24 hours after cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05054179.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegional Anesthesia & Pain MedicineSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207