Identification of natural products and synthetic analogs which inhibit microsporidia spores and prevent infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microsporidiosis, a disease caused by microsporidia, affects many animals, with symptoms ranging from diarrhea to death, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Current treatments, such as the drugs albendazole and fumagillin, are limited in efficacy. To address this problem, we utilized Caenorhabditis elegans infected with its naturally occurring microsporidian parasite Nematocida parisii to evaluate 4,080 structurally diverse compounds from the Boston University Center for Molecular Discovery (BU-CMD) chemical library. From this screen, we identified 34 compounds that restored the reproductive capacity of C. elegans. We chose 17 compounds for additional validation experiments and all of them prevented N. parisii infection in C. elegans, with 10 of these capable of suppressing microsporidia invasion by inactivating mature spores. Additionally, five of the identified compounds were effective against Pancytospora epiphaga, a species related to human-infecting microsporidia. Together this work identifies and characterizes compounds that inhibit microsporidia infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".