MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415952992 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202533809012

Dosimetry with a phoswich detector

2025· article· en· W4415952992 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolás Ávila, D. D. Döhler, Pia Kahle, Anja Seifert, T. Kormoll

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorMonte Carlo methodDosimetryPhotonCalibrationRadiationIonization chamberRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A phoswich detector concept based on the combination of a high-Z element and a plastic element with a free running analogue-to-digital converter is presented in this work for the simultaneous measurement of operational dosimetric quantities H ∗ (10) and H ′ (0.07) in photon radiation fields. By means of a Pulse Shape Discrimination method and down to an energy of 60 keV ( 241 Am) in continuous photon radiation fields, the signal arriving at the common light sensor was separated into components coming from each element of the detector. In this context, crosstalk between the sensitive volumes represented an obstacle and was solved with a proper covering over one of the elements. Additionally, an algorithm for the calculation of the intended quantities based on the measured deposited doses was developed and tested using Monte Carlo methods with monoenergetic and X-ray radiation fields. Simulations set a validity region for the algorithm to the energy range between 20 keV and 3 MeV in the case of monoenergetic radiation and a lower energy cut of 15 keV in the case of X-ray fields. Furthermore, the algorithm was tested experimentally using 241 Am (60 keV) and 137 Cs (662 keV) sources against reference values from an OD-01 ionization chamber. Results showed a good sensitivity to the incoming photon energy, reflected in the variation of the ratio between the measured doses with the considered energies. At the same time, discrepancies between the measured and reference values of the operational quantities highlighted the need for a better calibration of the algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207