MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415960473 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1700892

Reference values and biological factors influencing skin autofluorescence

2025· article· en· W4415960473 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel, Henderikus E. Boersma, Robert P. van Waateringe, Andrew D. Paterson, Melanie M. van der Klauw

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReference valuesAutofluorescencePhysical activityReference dataReference range

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tissue glycation, measured as skin autofluorescence (SAF) with an AGE Reader, has been associated with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and CVD and cancer mortality. Validated reference intervals in healthy individuals are needed to make useful and precise risk estimations. Methodology: This study utilises data from 82,870 participants of Western European descent in the Lifelines Cohort Study, a population-based study in the Netherlands. Reference values for SAF were established in healthy participants. Decade-specific mean SAF values were evaluated for former and current smokers, T2D, CVD, and impaired renal function. We also assessed the association of regular physical activity (PA) with SAF scores. Results: , and did not meet the metabolic syndrome criteria. Linear regression analyses yielded the following prediction for SAF, separately by sex: in males, SAF predicted = (0.0191 × age) + 1.038, and in females, SAF predicted = (0.0188 × age) + 0.994. Current smokers had consistently higher SAF scores. There was a progressively higher SAF with a higher number of pack-years of smoking in each age decade, in both sexes. For each decade, both people with T2D and CVD had significantly higher SAF values compared to healthy individuals. The same applied to participants with impaired renal function. There was a complex non-linear relationship between PA and age-adjusted SAF score: mean SAF was the highest in sedentary participants (e.g., 0 min/week moderate-to-vigorous physical activity), lowest in those with 150-299 min/week PA, and gradually increasing in participants with higher than 600 min/week PA. Conclusions: We provide robust reference values for SAF, established in healthy individuals of Western European descent, separately by sex, who have never smoked. Higher levels of SAF are observed in former and current smokers and in people with T2D, CVD, and impaired renal function. The relationship between physical activity and SAF scores is complex, with higher SAF scores demonstrated in sedentary people and those performing a large amount of moderate-to-vigorous physical exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in EndocrinologySame topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207