MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415964450 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.17495

Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Results for $2 \le n \le 35$ and comparison with experiment for the singlet and triplet $P$-states

2025· preprint· W4415964450 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G. W. F. Drake, Aaron Bondy, Oliver P. Hallett, Benjamin C. Najem

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsRydberg formulaExtrapolationIonizationPrincipal quantum numberQuantum defectSinglet stateIonization energyHeliumExcited stateRydberg state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High precision variational calculations in Hylleraas coordinates are presented for all singlet and triplet $P$-states of helium up to principal quantum number $n = 35$ with a uniform accuracy of 1 part in $10^{22}$ for the nonrelativistic energy. Mass polarization, relativistic and quantum electrodynamic effects are included to achieve a final accuracy of $\pm$1 kHz or better for the ionization energy of the Rydberg states of $^4$He in the range $24\le n \le 35$. The results are combined with 11 transition frequency measurements of Clausen et al. Phys. Rev. A 111, 012817 (2025) to obtain complementary measurements of the ionization energy of the $1s2s\;^3S_1$ state that do not depend on quantum defect extrapolations to the series limit. The result from the triplet spectrum yields an ionization energy of 1152 842 742.728(6) MHz, which agrees with but is larger than the experimental value by 14 $\pm$17 kHz. However, it confirms a much larger 9$σ$ discrepancy of $0.468\pm0.055$ MHz with the theoretical ionization energy of Patkóš et al. Phys. Rev. A 103, 042809 (2021). The results provide a test of the quantum defect extrapolation method at the level of $\pm$17 kHz. This revised version contains an additional table of spin-dependent matrix elements of the Breit interaction in the appendix for $24\le n\le 35$. (12 pages, 1 figure).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207