Discovery of Drug-like Inhibitors of the Human Caf1/CNOT7 poly(A)-Selective Nuclease Using Compound Screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human Ccr4–Not complex is a central regulator of post-transcriptional gene regulation, impacting on translation and mRNA degradation. In mRNA degradation, Ccr4–Not participates in the shortening of the mRNA poly(A)-tail via two catalytic subunits. The Caf1 nuclease is encoded by the highly similar paralogues CNOT7 or CNOT8. In addition to its poly(A)-specific ribonuclease activity, this subunit also provides a structural role by binding Ccr4, the second catalytic nuclease subunit encoded by the paralogues CNOT6 or CNOT6L. To facilitate investigations into the roles of the Caf1 subunit, and to complement genetic tools, we set out to identify inhibitors of the enzymatic activity of Caf1/CNOT7. To this end, we screened a library of 10,880 chemically diverse, drug-like compounds using a fluorescence-based biochemical assay. This effort led to the discovery of 15 inhibitors of Caf1/CNOT7 with biochemical IC50 values below 25 μM. Molecular docking was performed to explore potential binding modes of these compounds. The compounds reported here may be useful to differentiate between catalytic and non-catalytic roles of Caf1/CNOT7. In addition, they may be valuable starting points for the development of more potent inhibitors of the Caf1/CNOT7 poly(A)-selective ribonuclease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".