Prognostic value of disease severity and mechanical ventilation intensity in acute respiratory distress syndrome: analysis of the LUNG SAFE cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background We aimed to assess the prognostic performance of different indexes of oxygenation, respiratory mechanics and ventilation intensity in predicting 90-day mortality, and to estimate their independent associations, in a “real-world” observational cohort of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods This is a secondary analysis of LUNG SAFE (Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE), an international prospective cohort study of patients with severe respiratory failure involving 459 ICUs from 50 countries. We evaluated the prognostic performance of oxygenation (arterial oxygen tension ( P aO 2 )/inspiratory oxygen fraction ( F IO 2 )), respiratory mechanics (normalised elastance) and ventilation intensity (plateau pressure ( P plat ), driving pressure (DP), 4DP+respiratory rate (RR) and mechanical power (MP)) measured on day 1 of controlled mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients, with respect to ICU mortality within 90 days of admission. For each parameter, associations with mortality were assessed using logistic regression models, estimating effect sizes (odds ratios with 95% confidence interval), model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), calibration and overall predictive accuracy. Results Among 2813 early ARDS patients, 516 (18.3%) met the inclusion criteria: mean± sd age 60±16 years, 61% male. Normalised elastance, P plat , DP and 4DP+RR were significantly associated with mortality, with adjusted ORs ranging from 1.02 (95% CI 1.01–1.03) for 4DP+RR to 1.48 (95% CI 1.15–1.95) for normalised elastance. These parameters showed higher predictive accuracy for mortality compared with P aO 2 / F IO 2 and MP. MP showed a U-shaped relationship with mortality but was not significantly associated with it. Its predictive accuracy decreased after accounting for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and dynamic resistance, with PEEP also demonstrating a U-shaped association with mortality. Conclusions Normalised elastance, DP and 4DP+RR, measured at day 1 of ARDS, were the best predictors of ICU mortality, and outperformed oxygenation and MP. DP showed the best balance between predictive accuracy and clinical simplicity. These results reinforce the importance of focusing on DP and 4DP+RR as key metrics to guide lung-protective strategies and ARDS severity classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".