Fossil group origins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context . Fossil groups (FGs) are groups or clusters of galaxies with a single, massive, central galaxy dominating their luminosity distribution, and with a clear lack of L ∗ galaxies. The physical reason for the large magnitude gap (∆ m 12 ) in these systems is still a matter for investigation. It could originate in an early formation of FGs, followed by passive evolution in which all L ∗ galaxies merged with the central one, and/or it could be related to the fact that galaxies accreting on the FGs move on very radial orbits, reach small pericentric radii, and are merged on shorter timescales than regular cluster galaxies. The latter properties could be linked with the peculiar position of FGs within the cosmic web. Aims . To shed light on the origin of FGs, we determine the velocity anisotropy profile β ( r ) of the fossil cluster A267, which is related to the orbital distribution of cluster galaxies. This is the first individual FG for which the orbital distribution of its galaxies is determined. We aim to confirm previous findings based on stack samples that indicate that FGs, on average, host galaxies on more radial orbits than normal clusters. Methods . We started with a sample of 2315 redshifts for galaxies in the field of A267 and we determined the membership for 329 of them. Of these, 174 are located within the virial radius of the cluster, and we used them as tracers of the gravitational potential of the cluster to solve the Jeans equation for dynamical equilibrium using the MAMPOSSt algorithm. As a result, we obtained the cluster mass profile M ( r ) and β ( r ). We also estimated M ( r ) from the X-ray data by applying the hydrostatic equilibrium. Results . A comparison of the MAMPOSSt and X-ray-determined M ( r )s allows us to estimate the cluster hydrostatic mass bias, which we find to be consistent with previous findings. The anisotropy parameter β ( r ) indicates tangential orbits for the galaxies near the cluster centre and increasingly radial orbits in the external regions. We checked that our results are not affected by the presence of subclusters and by the choice of the models for M ( r ) and β ( r ). Conclusions . The A267 β ( r ) is very similar to that previously determined for a stack of large ∆ m 12 systems. Our analysis therefore confirms that FGs are characterized by more radial orbits for their member galaxies than the average cluster population. We speculate that this different orbital distribution might be an important element in creating a large ∆ m 12 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".