Post-migration sexual health and pleasure among gay and bisexual venezuelan migrant men in Lima, Peru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores how migration (re)shapes the sexual lives of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) from Venezuela now living in Lima, Peru. While global public health discourses have predominantly framed GBM migrant sexualities through narratives of risk, especially in relation to HIV, this study draws attention to the dynamic interplay between pleasure and vulnerability in post-migration sexuality. Based on five focus groups with 42 GBM Venezuelan migrants in Lima (age range 23–54; median 36), this analysis examines how post-migration contexts can open space for greater sexual freedom and experimentation, including the adoption of new practices such as cruising and group sex. Participants described migration as an opportunity to explore their sexual identities more openly, even as they reported encountering heightened risks to sexual health, such as more frequent condomless sex with casual partners and substance use during sexual activity. Amid the precarious context of resettlement, participants employed harm reduction strategies, including frequent testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). By examining how GBM migrants navigate sexuality, intimacy, and pleasure during post-migration and resettlement, this paper contributes to emerging scholarship in sex-positive public health that affirms erotic agency while attending to the structural conditions that shape vulnerability (e.g., HIV/STIs prevention barriers). In doing so, the paper offers a more nuanced understanding of male sexuality in South-South migration in Latin America, emphasizing the need for culturally grounded, non-stigmatizing interventions that support both sexual health and well-being by paying attention to migrant GBM’s pleasure beyond the limitations of risks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".