Safety and adverse events associated with dexmedetomidine for sedation in adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is increasingly used for sedation in critically ill adults due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and potential benefits over traditional sedatives. However, concerns persist regarding its cardiovascular safety. This meta-analysis comprehensively evaluates the incidence and nature of adverse events associated with DEX sedation in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A meta-analysis search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception to June 18, 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective/retrospective cohort studies, or descriptive studies with a comparator group, reporting safety outcomes in adults receiving DEX for ICU sedation. Primary outcomes were hemodynamic adverse events including hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia. Data were pooled using fixed-effects models, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane RoB 2.0 for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. GRADE assessed evidence certainty. Results Ten studies (7 randomized controlled trials, 3 cohorts; total n = 1,456 patients) were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased risk of bradycardia with dexmedetomidine versus controls (9 studies, n = 1,590; pooled OR = 2.38, 95% CI [1.77, 3.21], p < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%; high certainty evidence). No significant increase in overall hypotension risk was observed (9 studies, n = 1,422; OR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.91, 1.47], p = 0.25; I 2 = 44%; moderate certainty), though subgroup analyses indicated elevated risks in vulnerable populations. A modest but significant increase in tachycardia risk was found (4 studies, n = 1,084; OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.03, 1.83], p = 0.03), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 93%; low certainty) suggesting context-dependent effects. Risk of bias was generally low for RCTs, while observational studies demonstrated good quality but limited confounding adjustment. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine use for ICU sedation is consistently associated with a significantly increased risk of bradycardia. While the overall risk of hypotension was not significantly elevated, specific patient populations may be vulnerable. Tachycardia risk appears modest but highly variable. These findings underscore the necessity for careful patient selection, continuous hemodynamic monitoring particularly heart rate, and cautious titration when using DEX in critically ill adults. Future research should focus on high-risk subgroups and standardize adverse event definitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.020 | 0.045 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".