EZHIP boosts neuronal-like synaptic gene programs and depresses polyamine metabolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is currently understood that the characteristic loss of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 in PFA ependymoma and diffuse midline glioma (DMG) are caused by complementary mechanisms mediated by EZHIP and the oncohistone H3K27M, respectively. To support the complementarity of these mechanisms, rare H3K27M-negative DMGs express EZHIP. Interestingly, EZHIP is one of the few genes recurrently mutated in PFA. The significance of EZHIP mutations in PFA, and whether EZHIP has wider functions in addition to repression of H3K27me3 deposition, are not known. Here, we investigated the mutational landscape of EZHIP in pediatric brain tumors. We found that EZHIP mutations occur not only in PFA, but also in rare medulloblastoma and pediatric high-grade glioma (HGG), including in H3K27-positive DMG. Contrary to current expectations, we show that mutant EZHIP is expressed in H3K27M-positive DMG. All the EZHIP-mutated HGG cases also have EGFR mutations. Further, we pursued better understanding of the function of EZHIP by expressing it in human-derived neural models. Our transcriptomic analyses indicate that EZHIP expression potentiates neuronal-like gene programs associated with synaptic function. Metabolomics data indicate that EZHIP leads to repression of methionine and polyamine metabolism, suggesting links between metabolic and epigenetic changes that are observed in PFA. Collectively, our results expand the repertoire of tumor types known to harbor EZHIP mutations and shed light on EZHIP-dependent metabolic and transcriptional programs in relevant neural models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".