TRICURE: first-in-human study of the Topaz transcatheter tricuspid heart valve system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the poor prognosis of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients, there is growing interest in addressing TR, particularly since the emergence of novel transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions for patients at high risk for surgery. AIMS: The TRICURE first-in-human (FIH) study evaluates the initial feasibility and clinical safety of the Topaz transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) system in treating TR. Featuring a novel dual-stent design, the system is specifically engineered for the unique anatomy of the tricuspid valve. It has a flexible outer stent with low radial force designed to accommodate annular dynamics and conform to the non-circular, variable shapes of the tricuspid valve, coupled to a rigid inner stent aiming to maintain valve function integrity. METHODS: TRICURE FIH is a prospective, multicentre, first-in-human study with follow-up extending to 5 years. The primary safety endpoint is a composite measure including all-cause mortality, heart failure rehospitalisation, and reintervention for failed tricuspid therapy at 30 days. The primary performance endpoint is device success, defined as a TR reduction ≥1 grade with no more than moderate TR post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The procedure time (from delivery system insertion to removal) was 35±16 minutes. At 30 days, the primary safety endpoint, a composite of major adverse events, was observed in 35%, and the primary performance endpoint was successfully achieved in all patients (100%), with all patients having a TR reduction of at least 3 grades, and none of the patients having more than mild TR post-procedure. No device-related pacemaker implant was reported. An exemplary case report demonstrates complete elimination of TR and a reverse remodelling of the right ventricle of 19% at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The TRICURE FIH study provides evidence of the feasibility and safety of a novel TTVR system. Outcomes need to be confirmed in a larger series. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05126030).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".