MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415988287 · doi:10.3390/jfmk10040433

Effects of Pilates Matwork Core Exercises on Functioning in Middle-Aged Adult Women with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Through Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon Analysis: A Pilot RCT

2025· article· en· W4415988287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicola Marotta, Alessandro de Sire, Michele Mercurio, Ennio Lopresti, Lorenzo Scozzafava, Andrea Parente, Giorgio Gasparini, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow back painOswestry Disability IndexCore (optical fiber)TrunkRandomized controlled trialElectromyographyRelaxation (psychology)Core stability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Pilates is frequently recommended for patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain (CNLBP) due to its potential to enhance posture, muscle strength, trunk flexibility, and stability. However, to date, there is no robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of Pilates in managing CNLBP. This study aimed to assess the effects of 8 × 8 Pilates Matwork core exercises on pain and functioning in middle-aged adult women with CNLBP, through a flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) analysis. Methods: We included middle adult women (n = 21) with diagnosis of CNLBP and a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) > 4. The experimental group underwent a treatment of eight Pilates Matwork sessions, biweekly for 4 weeks, lasting about 40 min. The control group underwent standardized exercises used for managing CNLBP. Outcome measures included NRS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and the FRP ratio via surface electromyography during trunk maximum flexion. We evaluated the participants at the baseline (T0), at the end of the 4-week treatment (T1), and at 4 weeks after the end of the treatment, at 8 weeks from the baseline (T2). Results: In this pilot RCT, 21 middle-aged adult women affected by CNLBP were randomly allocated with a ratio of 1:1 in the Pilates group, and in parallel in the control group. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in ODI and QBPDS scores compared to the control group, maintained at follow-up for ODI, along with an NRS reduction at T2. About FRP, Pilates has proven to be comparable to conventional treatment, showing no significant difference in FRR at T1 and T2. Only the experimental group exceeded the 9.5 cutoff at T2, as a protective predictive index for CNLBP. Conclusions: This pilot RCT provided preliminary evidence that Pilates might be an effective rehabilitation method, enhancing functioning and pain management in middle-aged adult women affected by CNLBP. The FRP study proves to be efficient in translating clinical assessments into rehabilitation assessment measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologySame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207