MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415988937 · doi:10.1002/alz.70887

Identifying sex‐ and gender‐specific endocrinological, lifestyle, psychosocial, and socio‐cultural targets for Alzheimer's disease prevention in Africans: The Female Brain Health and Endocrine Research in Africa (FemBER‐Africa) project

2025· article· en· W4415988937 on OpenAlexaff
Chinedu Udeh‐Momoh, Benard Aliwa, Lukoye Atwoli, Karen Blackmon, Edna Bosire, Samuel Gitau, Harrison Kaleli, Ciru Kamanda, Linda Khakali, Rachel Maina, Peter Mativo, Sylvia Mbugua, Zul Merali, Kendi Muchungi, Nyambura Njogu, Douglas Nyankira, Violet Okech, Alice Ondieki, Catherine Onyancha, Stanley Omondi Onyango, Jasmit Shah, Sheena Shah, Cynthia Smith, Dilraj Sokhi, Sheila Waa, Sarah Gregory, Tanisha G. Hill‐Jarrett, Dimitra Kafetsouli, Michelle M. Mielke, Graciela Muñiz‐Terrera, Alina Solomon, Thomas Thesen, Elena Tsoy, Anusha Yasoda‐Mohan, Jennifer S. Yokoyama, Tamlyn Watermeyer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on Drug AbuseWellcome TrustNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsDementiaDiseasePsychosocialCohortMenopauseNeuroimagingIntervention (counseling)Cohort studyEndocrine systemAlzheimer's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dementia rates are rising globally, with the burden increasing most rapidly in low- to middle-income countries. Despite this, research into Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) among African populations remains limited, with existing models based on Western cohorts that overlook sex-, gender-, and ancestry-specific factors. The Female Brain Health and Endocrine Research in Africa (FemBER-Africa) project, hosted at the Brain and Mind Institute, Aga Khan University, Kenya, will establish a deeply phenotyped cohort of 250 African individuals across the ADRD spectrum. It will assess sex-specific risk factors linked to ethnicity, lifestyle, and endocrinological variables using fluid-based biomarkers (blood and saliva), neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography), and culturally adapted cognitive tests. By comparing data with Western and diasporic cohorts, the study aims to identify ancestry-specific and shared mechanisms driving ADRD risk and progression. The findings will support targeted, culturally relevant prevention and intervention strategies, addressing the underrepresentation of African populations in global dementia research. HIGHLIGHTS: By 2030, > 78 million individuals are expected to have dementia, with the highest burden among women in low- to middle-income countries. Despite this, African populations remain underrepresented in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research. Existing ADRD risk models fail to account for the unique influence of sex, gender, and ancestry on dementia risk. Female-specific reproductive and hormonal factors, including menopause transition and hormone therapy use, are poorly integrated into current models. The Female Brain Health and Endocrine Research in Africa (FemBER-Africa) project is the first large-scale study to examine sex- or gender-specific and endocrine contributors to ADRD in an African population, using advanced diagnostic, biomarker, and culturally adapted cognitive assessments. The study will assess how biological (hormonal, metabolic), lifestyle (physical activity, diet), and socio-cultural (education, health-care access) factors interact to influence ADRD risk in African women. Insights from FemBER-Africa will inform the development of sex- and gender-specific, culturally adapted ADRD prevention strategies, enhancing the precision and equity of dementia mitigation efforts globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→