Analysis of Cooling Regimes as a Function of Biot Number During Quenching by Immersion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper analyses the transition temperature and duration of the cooling regimes (film boiling, transition boiling, nucleate boiling, and convection) during quenching by immersion of specimens covering a range of Biot numbers from 0.70 to 1.32. Test data were acquired under an industrial environment, thus capturing the in situ conditions, information that is rarely available in the literature. The experimentally acquired cooling curves were processed to determine characteristic points, in the form of time, temperature, and cooling rate, representing the transition between cooling regimes. These points were precisely identified as per the peaks of the cooling curve derivatives with respect to time. The results show that transition temperatures tend to decrease with the number following a linear behavior. Correlation models between the duration of each regime and the number were developed following the nonlinear behavior of the regimes. The duration of boiling phases and convection evolve inversely; the former prevails as the number decreases, while the latter drives the cooling time for larger numbers. The models provide reference points for time and temperature that constitute the basis for a more comprehensive thermal modeling of immersion quenching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it