MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415995554 · doi:10.1186/s40352-025-00376-y

The weight of words: a scoping review of depression and suicidal ideation among 911 call takers and dispatchers

2025· review· en· W4415995554 on OpenAlexafffund
Deepika Rani, Gillian Foley, Doug Johnson, Timothy William, Marcella Siqueira Cassiano

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth & Justice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsMacEwan UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsSuicidal ideationDepression (economics)Public healthSample (material)WorkforceSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Communicators in public safety, such as 911 telecommunicators, emergency medical dispatchers, and police and fire dispatchers, frequently deal with distressing calls, traumatic narratives, and high-stakes decisions. Despite not being physically present at crisis scenes, these experts endure psychological stress on par with first responders. This scoping review examines the prevalence and determinants of depression and suicidal ideation among public safety communicators and their co-occurrence, summarizes the occupational and personal risk factors contributing to these outcomes, and evaluates proposed mitigation strategies. RESULTS: The research indicates that depression is reported at elevated rates in this workforce, ranging from 8.4% to 73%, depending on the population and the sensitivity of the instrument, based on 11 quantitative studies published between 1995 and 2025. Although less studied, suicidal ideation appears to be significantly higher in this group compared to the general population. Contributing factors include indirect trauma exposure, shift work, emotional suppression, organizational neglect, and a history of trauma. The frequent co-occurrence of depression and suicidal ideation supports the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide as a relevant explanatory framework. CONCLUSIONS: Despite accumulating evidence, research is methodologically limited due to cross-sectional designs, inconsistent screening tools, and sample homogeneity. Existing interventions, such as peer support, debriefing, and trauma-informed training, are inconsistently applied and under-evaluated. The findings highlight a pressingneed for longitudinal research, targeted interventions, and workplace reforms that take into account the unique psychological burdens associated with communicator roles. Addressing depression and suicide risk among these professionals is critical to ensuring both workforce well-being and the continued effectiveness of public safety systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth & JusticeSame topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207