Unraveling the intertwined threads of insomnia and sarcopenia in cognitive and functional impairment in octogenarians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although insomnia and sarcopenia may seem unrelated in the context of older adult health, recent evidence has revealed shared underlying pathophysiological pathways. However, the extent to which these two factors jointly impact crucial clinical outcomes still needs to be determined. This study aimed to elucidate the associations of insomnia and sarcopenia with cognitive dysfunction and functional impairment, shedding light on potential mechanistic connections. METHODS: In this observational study, we scrutinized data collected from 493 individuals aged ≥ 80 years between 2016 and 2018. Sarcopenia was assessed using the EWGSOP2 criteria, insomnia was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index, functional status was assessed using the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Scale, and cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The baseline assessments included blood lipid, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and CRP levels and DNA methylation. RESULTS: Insomnia alone was not associated with cognitive impairment or functional dependence. However, sarcopenia alone increased the odds of cognitive dysfunction by a factor of 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-5.6, p = 0.011), although it did not impact functional impairment. When examined together, insomnia and sarcopenia were associated with 4.8-fold increased odds of cognitive impairment (95% CI 2.1-10.9, p < 0.001) and 7.1-fold increased odds of functional impairment (95% CI 1.7-29.0, p = 0.007) compared to those with neither condition. Lipid profiles and inflammatory marker levels did not differ, but sarcopenic individuals had significantly greater DNA methylation (p < 0.001). We observed a positive multiplicative interaction between insomnia and sarcopenia on continuous MoCA scores, with a statistically significant synergy index and consistent interaction metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Insomnia and sarcopenia synergistically increase the risk of cognitive dysfunction among long-lived older adults. Sarcopenia alone impacted cognition in individuals, which could be related to the increase in inflammation-independent DNA methylation observed among individuals with sarcopenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Number. NCT02366104.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".