In the Shadows: Tales of Cultural Marginalization in Modern Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This panel symposium aims to offer a deeper understanding of the complexities of cultural marginalization and how actors (individuals, organizations, and communities) navigate these challenges. In a world marked by elevated global uncertainty, recent years have seen a noticeable surge in extremism, totalitarianism, and displacement. Within such times, marginalized actors face significant distress due to their lack of power, status, or resources, and cannot effectively defend their interests against more powerful and established actors. As a result, a historical pattern emerges: these marginalized actors experience a loss of both material and symbolic cultural resources, often due to various forms of dominance, whether physical or symbolic. Organizational theorists have increasingly directed their focus toward the concept of marginalization, with a specific emphasis on cultural aspects as a foundation for such marginalization. However, the existing literature in this domain lacks substantial theoretical integration, particularly in understanding the specific dynamics related to “Cultural marginalization” and the strategies actors use to manage these challenges. Cultural marginalization has long-lasting effects, which scholars are still uncovering. Our panelists encompass conceptual and empirical research works allowing us to explore diverse culturally marginalized contexts worldwide, including a marginalized community in Kenya, women in Saudi Arabia, a peasant kin group in rural Korea, and a marginalized Vietnamese community in the UK.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".