MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Good, the Unconscious, and the Dynamic: Rethinking Disidentification at Work

2025· article· en· W4416001436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Power and Status Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManagerialismBoycottPsychology of selfSocial identity theoryPoliticsDeviance (statistics)Identity (music)Collective identity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disidentification refers to an individual’s perceived sense of separation from: (a) personal characteristics or traits (personal disidentification, e.g., not identifying as a smoker); (b) a role or relationship (relational disidentification, e.g., not identifying as a leader); and/or (c) a group (social disidentification, e.g., not identifying with an organization) (Elsbach, 1999). Together, identification (a sense of oneness) with and disidentification (a sense of separation) from targets shape an individual’s identity (Stone, 1962). Existing research has predominantly focused on the detrimental consequences of disidentification, ranging from boycott and public disparagement (Elsbach and Bhattacharya, 2001; Pratt, 2000) to workplace deviance (Bolton et al., 2012) and organizational crimes (e.g., Vadera & Pratt, 2013). However, the overwhelming focus on negative outcomes has contributed to disidentification’s receiving less scholarly attention compared to identification (Kalkman, 2023; Kreiner & Ashforth, 2004). The papers in this symposium seek to reinvigorate research on disidentification by addressing key limitations: its prevailing characterization as dysfunctional, the lack of consensus on its definition and mechanisms, and the limited exploration of its temporal dynamics (Ashforth, Harrison, & Corley, 2008). Revitalizing Disidentification Research in Organizational Studies Author: Neveen Mohamed; Vlerick Business School Author: Elise B. Jones; U.S. Coast Guard Academy Author: Nana Yaa Antwi-Gyamfi; Author: Mailys George; IESE Business School Imprisoned: Disidentification and Institutional Neurosis in Prison Staff Facing Role Conflict Author: Aušrine Vyšniauskaite; KU Leuven Author: Mailys George; IESE Business School How Workers Facilitate Clients’ Disidentification from Stigmatized Identities Author: Muhammad Aqeel Awan; London School of Economics and Political Science Author: Ussama Ahmad Khan; London Business School Author: Lidiia Pletneva; The London School of Economics & Political Science Doctors Driving Taxi Cabs: Enduring Disidentification in Downward Occupational Transition Author: Madeline Toubiana; University of Ottawa Author: Luciana Turchick Hakak; University of the Fraser Valley

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it