Spiritual and Religious Perspective on Management Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This symposium examines management education from spiritual and religious perspectives. We follow Wickert and Muzio’s (2024, p.2) call for management education “to reinvent itself in light of the urgent ecological threats posed by the crossing of multiple planetary boundaries.” The presenters in this symposium discuss courses that they have designed from a spiritual and/or religious perspective, with a focus on developing a transcendent self in an interconnected and interdependent world. Spiritual and religious perspectives on management education Author: Louis W. Fry; Texas A&M University-Central Texas Motivation and happiness at work Author: Fong T. Keng-Highberger; Nanyang Technological University Revamping the MBA: A soul-searching transformation Author: Payal Kumar; Conscious Business Education – from syllabi to alliances Author: Richard Jackson Major; IGS-RH Groupe Igensia Education Exploring Zen-informed teaching practice in the management classroom Author: Tianyuan Yu; Mount Saint Vincent University
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".