MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416008526 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2513032

Fish-Oil Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

2025· article· en· W4416008526 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Charmaine E. Lok, Michael E. Farkouh, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Louise Moist, Kevan R. Polkinghorne, George Tomlinson, Paul Tam, Marcello Tonelli, Jacob A. Udell

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of CalgaryThe Scarborough HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of AlbertaToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersLawson Health Research InstituteNational Health and Medical Research CouncilHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHemodialysisStroke (engine)Heart failureHeart rateBlood pressureDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients receiving hemodialysis, yet effective preventive therapies remain limited. Supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), may have cardiovascular benefits in the general population, but efficacy among patients receiving hemodialysis is uncertain. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 26 sites in Canada and Australia, we assigned adult patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis to daily supplementation with fish oil (4 g of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [1.6 g of EPA and 0.8 g of DHA]) or corn-oil placebo. The primary end point was a composite of all serious cardiovascular events including sudden and nonsudden cardiac death, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease leading to amputation, and fatal and nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included extension of the primary end point to include noncardiac causes of death, the individual components of the primary end point, and a first cardiovascular event or death from any cause. RESULTS: Between November 28, 2013, and July 22, 2019, a total of 1228 participants underwent randomization; 610 were assigned to the fish-oil group and 618 to the placebo group. During 3.5 years of follow-up, the rate of serious cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the fish-oil group than in the placebo group (0.31 vs. 0.61 per 1000 patient-days; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.70; P<0.001). The rate of the extended primary end point that included noncardiac causes of death appeared to be lower in the fish-oil group than in the placebo group, with a hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.90). The hazard ratio for cardiac death was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.75); for fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.80); for peripheral vascular disease leading to amputation, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.86); for fatal and nonfatal stroke, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.76); and for a first cardiovascular event or death from any cause, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.87). Adherence to the trial regimen and the incidence of adverse events did not differ meaningfully between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of serious cardiovascular events among participants receiving maintenance hemodialysis was lower with daily supplementation with n-3 fatty acids than with placebo. (Supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and others; PISCES ClinicalTrials.gov number, ISRCTN00691795.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of Medicine→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→