MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416011841 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0335453

Reduced mortality but elevated venous thromboembolism risk following knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A general population-based cohort study

2025· article· en· W4416011841 on OpenAlexaff
Xinjia Deng, Na Lu, Dongxing Xie, Hui Li, Haochen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
FundersFundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University
KeywordsArthroplastyRheumatoid arthritisOsteoarthritisCohort studyCohortHip arthroplastyRetrospective cohort studyVenous thromboembolismLower risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arthroplasty is indicated for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experience significant joint damage, including bone erosions, cartilage degradation and joint deformities. However, studies on its associations with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with RA are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the relation of knee arthroplasty or hip arthroplasty to all-cause mortality, relative risk of CVD and incident VTE among patients with RA. We included patients with RA (ages≥20 years) from a large United Kingdom primary care database (i.e., IQVIA Medical Research Database). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (n = 4,774 for knee arthroplasty, n = 3,362 for hip arthroplasty). The secondary outcomes included incident CVD (n = 4,350 for knee arthroplasty, n = 2,390 for hip arthroplasty) and incident VTE (n = 4,574 for knee arthroplasty, n = 3,174 for hip arthroplasty). We conducted propensity score-matched cohort studies to compare the risks of each outcome between subjects with and without knee arthroplasty (n = 2,387 each) and those with and without hip arthroplasty (n = 1,681 each), respectively. We found that subjects with knee arthroplasty had a 23% lower risk of mortality than those without knee arthroplasty (HR: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.65-0.90). Similarly, a lower, albeit non-statistically significant, risk of mortality was observed among subjects with hip arthroplasty than those without arthroplasty (HR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.73-1.04). Compared with those without arthroplasty, subjects with knee or hip arthroplasty had a lower risk of CVD. The corresponding HRs were 0.86 (95%CI: 0.73-1.01) and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.69-1.02), respectively. Both subjects with knee or hip arthroplasty showed a higher risk of VTE than their counterparts (HR for knee arthroplasty: 1.63 [95%CI: 1.23-2.17]; HR for hip arthroplasty: 2.19 [95%CI: 1.54-3.11]). The associations of arthroplasty with the risks of mortality, CVD and VTE were generally consistent across strata of age and sex, with HR ranges from 0.71-3.75 for knee arthroplasty and 0.66-3.36 for hip arthroplasty. In this large population-based cohort of patients with RA, knee arthroplasty was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, while both knee and hip arthroplasty were associated with a higher risk of VTE. No significant associations were observed with CVD. These findings highlight potential long-term benefits and risks of joint replacement in RA, but given the observational design and possibility of residual confounding, the results should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. Further studies are warranted to confirm these observations and to better understand the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→